Linear and Circular Model of Communication Essay

Any act by which angiotensin-converting enzyme someone gives to or receives from an distinct someone, information about that persons needs, desires, perceptions, knowledge, or emotive states. Communication may be intentional or unintentional, may charter conventional or unconventional signals, may analyze linguistic or nonlinguistic forms, and may occur through spoken or other modes.In light of the above definition of chat, the achiever of the Linear and bank bill model of dialogue is dependent upon how successful the pith is transmitted and if at that place is a desired effect on the person that is addressed in the communication process. Aristotles model of communication came to the conclusion that the last person in the communication chain the receiver holds the key to whether or non decorous communication has taken place. In Shannon and weaverbirds 1949 model of communication the communication process is described as a one way one-dimensional process in which the sp eaker speaks and the date stamper listens, when she takes the variable of noise or interference or any distorting measures into place in her equation we tush see that the running(a) model cannot work.If distortions do happen within the transmission process and information is not transmitted accurately both Aristotle and Lasswell opening is infringed upon as in the case of Lasswell the desired effect would not be achieved or with Aristotle the whole process f solelys apart because the proper message is not transmitted to the person that is being addressed. The main flaw of the linear model therefore is where communication is depicted as a one way process where speakers only speak and never listen and this implies that listeners listen and never speak or steer messagesSchramm 1955 and Wood 2009 sought to overpower the non-relevance of this theory in the evolving world of communication by developing the synergistic model of communication, this model saw the receiver or listen der providing feedbacks to the sender or speaker. The speaker or sender of the message also listens to the feedback given by the receiver or listener and both the speaker and listener take turns to speak and listen to each other. This feedback is given either verbally or non-verbally of in both ways. This model which bears more realistic appeal to a real conduct like structure is not substantially different from the circular model of communication as it also depicts communication as a high-powered process in which both the participants are actively engaged in encoding, transmitting, receiving and decoding messages.Providing an example on the applicability of this in the modern era of communication we can take the example of a press meeting conducted by a firm in the count of some scandal that the firm is facing. If we were to follow the linear model of communication, the person conducting the conference would say all that he or she has to say, taking Shannon and Weavers variable of interupptions out of the equation we can still see that this situation is not a perfect example of communication for more reasons.First the delivery of a point maynot have been put into proper words and there the throng in attendance at the conference would not get the correct point as there would be no way for them to clarify from the spokeperson what they mean. Secondly everything about the situation may not have been dealt with and there is no way that the attendants can demand fromt he spokesperson if everything is addressed. Finally there may be an posting from the attendants about the issue that may significantly change the course of communcation however thay observation cannot be told to the spokeperson because of the rigidity of the linear model of communication.The transactional model which bears no substantial differene to the circular model of communication drove the final nails in the coffin to the linear model of communication. This model was later developed to dea with the major(ip) drambacks in the interactive model, drawbacks which included inability to indiacted that communicators can both send and receive messages simultaneously and that failure to show that communication is a dynamic process which changes over time. There are three implications of the transactional model that shows that the rigidities of the linear model is not very practical to effective real life communication.Firstly communication is an ongoing and continuously changing process, you are changing, the people with who you are communication are changing and your environment is also continually changing, secondly in an transactional process, each element exists in relation to all the other elements, there is an interdependence where there can be no source without a receiver and no message wihtou a source, in the long run each person in the communication process reacts depending on factors such as their background, prior experience, attitydes cultural beliefs and se lf esteem.From the above we can reckon that Communication is not linear, but circular the rigidities of the linear theory which makes it brassbound demonstrates that. Various works also byThe linear model bases its success that there is a clear cut beginning and end to communication and there is no feedback from the receiver. Basing our analysis of circular and linear communication in a business environment