Effect of Parent Addiction on Children

Effect of P atomic number 18nt dep endingence on ChildrenAntonio LathamChildren of P atomic number 18nts with AddictionDrug and alcohol dependance is prevalent in America. Within the U.S., thither has been an increasing emphasis and mounting research on how stiral dependency impacts the lives of children (Barnard McKeganey, 2004). This alarm is being powered in constituent by the escalation of disturbing incidents involving extreme knock off and abuse that children of dose or alcohol habituate parented subject them to (Barnard McKeganey, 2004). Studies now show that children who endure with parents who suffer from any ticker addiction are likely to be unstable, demonstrate severe stimulated and behavioral issues (Barnard McKeganey, 2004). Moreover, this present great ch solelyenges for children matriculating by dint of school (Barnard McKeganey, 2004). These children are frequently exposed to one or some(prenominal) warmness dependent parents that are unstable and ch aotic places where drugs and criminal application occur regularly (Barnard McKeganey, 2004). For U.S. citizens working with such families and children, it is important to recognize tenderness abuse early and confront the difficult needs of parents with substance addiction and those of their children (Barnard McKeganey, 2004).Over the last several years, researchers and advocates of childs rights have developed advanced strategies and programs that have facilitated innovative guidelines for a more efficient, cooperative, and holistic onset to helping the parent and child (Barnard McKeganey, 2004). This paper get out analyze the behavioral, academic, and growing problems associated with growing up in a household where a parent suffers from drug or alcohol addiction. Additionally, this paper go forth provide discipline on the connection between substance addiction and child neglect. It will also explore explains approaches for prevention, interpolation, and treatment that i ncluding examples of effective programs and practices.Behavioral, Academic, Development stuporWhen m separates or fathers abuse substances, this greatly impact the behavioral, academic, and development growth of the children. Studies show that these children are more likely to suffer signs of depression and anxiety, experience rational unbalance and display conduct problems (McKeganey, Barnard, McIntosh, 2002). All of these issues have both long and short-term effect in which will determine the life trajectory these children will follow. Academically, these children often score lower on school academic exams and screening different signs of struggles in school such continued conflict with peers (McKeganey, Barnard, McIntosh, 2002).Children of parents with addiction may demonstrate behaviors that are difficult for their addicted parents to effectively process (McKeganey, Barnard, McIntosh, 2002). This can produce unreliable parenting and the likelihood the child will be re moved from their paternal homes. Studies on childrens behavioral issues reveal that children of drug abusers exhibit some of the following characteristic lack of compassion for other individuals reduced affectionate inter bring through and interpersonal engagement low office and defiance against authority (McKeganey, Barnard, McIntosh, 2002).For straitlaced development, children need positive social and emotional reinforcement, especially from their parents. Children are more capable of reaching their optimal potential difference if they experience steady, certain, enhanced, and motivating relations with their family and other kinships (McKeganey, Barnard, McIntosh, 2002). A lack of this has been in the main linked to developmental problems for the child. For instance, when a child suffers repeated instance of neglect from the parent, especially during the young developmental stages, activation of the stress response systems is respectively damaged (McKeganey, Barnard, McI ntosh, 2002). The often result in the child responding to normal situations in a threatening or alarm manner (McKeganey, Barnard, McIntosh, 2002). wide-term Impact for ChildrenChildren of substance-addicted parents will often have lingering effects long into due date that will impact their maturity (Haggerty, Skinner, Fleming, Gainey, Catalano, 2008). Although it is important to note that not all children will experience long-term consequence, however, they may have an increased vulnerability. agnate substance addiction can have a plethora of long-term effects on their physical well-being (Haggerty et al, 2008). These include poor mentality development and increased chances of obesity and malnutrition (Haggerty et al, 2008).The more instantaneous emotional effects of parental substance addiction produce feelings of loneliness, depression anxiety, and an unwillingness to assurance (Haggerty et al, 2008). These can translate into permanent mental consequences in adulthood, incl uding low self-worth, insecurity, and relationship problems (Haggerty et al, 2008). Research steadily reveals an increased probability that children who have lived with substance addicted parents will eventually take on negative habits such as smoking, abusing alcohol, or engaging in illegal drugs (Haggerty et al, 2008).Prevention Intervention StrategiesTo end the cycle of destruction and decrease the possibility of lasting effects, researchers agree that there must be continued development and implementation of methods to prevent substance addiction from occurring and dangerously effecting children (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). While experts concede that the causes of substance addiction and its effects on children are complex, it is probable to formulate prevention strategies that tackle recognised risk factors (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). Prevention initiatives are best to thwart the onslaught of the mental and physical effects children are likely to have when growing u p in a home where a parent is addicted to drugs or alcohol.The best prevention method is identifying children who live within these homes and provide provide for both child and parent. Researchers encourage inspiring intellectual, emotional, societal, and physical experiences for children through various outlets (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). According to Fraser, McIntyre, and Manby (2009), prevention methods should first involve understanding important principles of whole growth and development for children that will help to identify sensitive or affirmable threatening issues in homes and within the child. Academic institutions play a crucial role in prevention as well as intervention (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). Schools should be adequately informed on application and interrogatory of educational and prevention programs as well bringing additional sensory faculty to the issue (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009).Once the issue has occurred, the next best course of action is intervention. Fraser, McIntyre, and Manby (2009) explains that because of the greater risks associated with parental substance addiction, it is especially significant for schools and child work personnel to thoroughly assess thoroughly the needs of the children to effectuate the or so beneficial change. Intervention revolves around providing a home environment that is safe, predictable, and nurturing for the children (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). Moreover, intervention should entail family-centered treatment programs that provide care for parents in facilities where children are allowed and are able to aid in the healing of parent and child (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). Ultimately, proper intervention will use other family members without addiction issues to help posit balance and harmony within the child.ConclusionThe body of research on children with addiction continues to grow and highlight legion(predicate) alarming issues, such as child abuse and neglect. This ty pe of environment affects the child in many ways including behaviorally, academically, and developmentally (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). Though the effects may vary item on many variables, the potential for destruction create enough social panic for proper prevention and intervention strategies. Researchers are encouraging entrance recognition and responses to this epidemic in a way that effect home(a) policies (Fraser, McIntyre, Manby, 2009). It is vital for this nation to allocate as much resources as possible to the development and implementation of prevention and intervention tactics and services.ReferencesBarnard, M., McKeganey, N. (2004). The impact of parental problem drug use on childrenwhat is the problem and what can be done to help?. Addiction, 99(5), 552-559.Fraser, C., McIntyre, A., Manby, M. (2009). Exploring the impact of parental drug/alcoholproblems on children and parents in a midlands county in 2005/06. British Journal ofSocial Work, 39(5), 846-866.Hagge rty, K. P., Skinner, M., Fleming, C. B., Gainey, R. R., Catalano, R. F. (2008). Longterm effects of the Focus on Families project on substance use disorders among childrenof parents in methadone treatment. Addiction, 103(12), 2008-2016.McKeganey, N., Barnard, M., McIntosh, J. (2002). Paying the price for their parentsaddiction showdown the needs of the children of drug-using parents. Drugs education,prevention and policy, 9(3), 233-246.